|
 Writings is the
home for general works by friends of the Claremont Institute that
don't fall into any other site category, such as our projects or
Precepts newsletter.

 Ken
Masugi is director of the Claremont Institute's Center for
Local Government, and is a contributing editor of the Claremont
Review of Books. He is the co-author of Democracy in California: Politics and Government in
the Golden State.
Also by Ken Masugi
The
Libertarian Seduction Posted on
April 21, 2005
The
Ultimate Redistricting Reform: Blow Up the
Legislature Posted on March 31,
2005
Bush's
Second Inaugural: Reversing FDR Posted on January 20, 2005

 Love's
Language Lost Posted on April 21,
2005
Local
Politics and the English Language Posted on April 20, 2005
Having
it Both Ways on "Values" Posted on
April 14, 2005
 Looking
for something? Enter any text below to search our content.
Or, find an article by author,
topic
or date
directly.
 Enter
your email address below to join Precepts, our free weekly policy
watch newsletter.
|
 |
Home »
Writings »
Redcoat Dawn
A review of "The Patriot," starring Mel Gibson, directed by
Roland Emmerich.
In the movie "Red Dawn" (1984) a group of high school students
defends American soil against a Communist invasion across its
southern border. Courageous and innovative, they wage a desperate
fight against Cuban and Nicaraguan-led professional soldiers. But
the kids' war is uninspired by knowledge of what they are fighting
for and therefore by any idealism. These partisans, or guerilla
fighters, are defending their turf, avenging the loss of friends and
families. They are merely doing what the Russians or any other
peoples did, faced with invasions over the centuries.
This deficiency comes through clearly in the film's epilogue,
when we read the mutilated version of the Gettysburg Address
commemorating "Partisan Rock" following the war's successful
conclusion. Perhaps director John Milius was suggesting that America
was invaded by Third Worlders precisely because it had forgotten its
identity, that its greatness came from its ideals — not from even
the most dedicated love of the soil that animated all hitherto
existing patriotisms.
"The Patriot" is more than another story of the rejection of an
alien force committing atrocities on American soil. (Roland Emmerich
also directed "Independence Day".) The themes of vengeance and love
of family are all there, but they are transcended by the theme of
founding a nation.
How does political life relate to human life? At the beginning of
the movie Mel Gibson's character, Benjamin Martin, expresses a
Tocquevillean individualism — living only for the small circle
around himself and his family — born of his horrific experiences in
the French and Indian Wars. But attempting to live apart from others
causes the destruction of his old family.
While based loosely on the story of the "Swamp Fox," Francis
Marion, The Patriot is really a story of all the wars Americans or
anyone else have ever fought. It is thus both an anti-war movie and
a movie that justifies war. It is about any warrior who knows the
loss of loved ones, whether in the battles of the Revolution or
throughout the ages of wars in Serbia. The Civil War, World War II,
and Vietnam are all conflated in this movie about America's
revolutionary and founding era — hence the historical anachronisms.
Every war is ugly, every war gives birth to new hopes, new worlds.
How can one escape Machiavellianism that all civilized people
shrink from yet adopt when it suits their advantage? Both sides
struggle with that question but perpetrate atrocities against
noncombatants or prisoners.
If "The Patriot" has its share of movie cliches — relieved by
riveting battle scenes and extraordinary twists of fortune — they
are spent largely in refuting far more serious cliches: That the
Declaration of Independence had no effect on freeing the slaves and
that the Revolution was less than a glorious cause.
Martin evolves to a mature American by applying his reason and
refining his passions. The political wisdom for our time is not so
much the friendship between whites and blacks displayed, but
Martin's observation that it is as bad to be governed by 3,000
tyrants a mile away (as an independent republic) as to be governed
by a single tyrant 3,000 miles away.
Can we Americans today heed this message? Can we not feel his
outrage, and then take the appropriate, reasoned action? Thus, guns
in the hands of his young boys make perfect sense — not a sign of
Columbine terrorism — especially when they shoot with such unerring
accuracy.
In the end, reason and passion are rewarded by God's grace. Even
the ruins of churches offer reward. The cause of the Revolution and
of the new nation is forged in churches. Martin learns Job's lessons
at the dawn of a new birth of freedom.
It is unfortunate that this movie set in South Carolina appeared
too late to have an effect on that state's unfortunate recent
dispute over the Confederate flag. Too often much of the South
today, white and black, thinks of itself as still living in the era
of the Civil War. Blacks claim the right to be pitied because they
are descendants of slaves, while whites feel a pride in having
fought for a noble, albeit losing cause — of slavery. They think
like antebellum Carolinians or Virginians (or Richmonders) or
Georgians. They don't think like Americans. By contrast, "The
Patriot"'s blacks, slave and free, are human — they suffer and
thrive as humans, as Americans.
The Patriot's extraordinary predecessor, "Gladiator," depicted
the unsuccessful attempt to restore the Roman republic. Another
revenge movie that is more than that, "The Patriot" describes a
successful creation of a republic, and the necessary sacrifice and
suffering that must accompany this worthy endeavor.
The culmination of "The Patriot"'s teaching is seen in "Saving
Private Ryan," yet another movie scorned by many conservative
critics, who ignored the film's explicit reliance on Abraham
Lincoln's understanding of the war. (Both movies had the same
writer, Robert Rodat.) The American founding was comprehensively
defended in theory and practice by Lincoln. Martin learns how to
treat his family as part of a new political order ("The Cause"),
just as Private Ryan acquires a higher understanding of his brothers
and family, and how his soul must be judged by his duty to his
greater family.
"The Patriot" does not possess the graces of what is still the
best movie on the American Revolution, John Ford's "Drums Along the
Mohawk" (1939). "The Patriot" does not surpass "Glory" in its
attempt to show how blacks belong in America. It will not have the
cult status of "Sands of Iwo Jima". And to be cosmopolitan, "The
Patriot" is no "Alexander Nevsky." It is, rather, an exploration of
the quality of soul that Aristotle thought makes men human and
political — spiritedness. It is a quality we Americans need to think
about and cultivate, and "The Patriot" is a magnificent attempt to
do so.
« Home
« Writings
|