Emergency War Surgery NATO Handbook: Part I: Types of Wounds and Injuries: Chapter VII: Mass Causalties in Thermonuclear Warfare
United States Department of Defense
Peer Review Status: Internally Peer
Reviewed
If nuclear weapons casualties are encountered, the basic principles of mass casualty management (triage, evacuation, and the use of standardized care interventions) will have to be followed. Our relative inexperience in with these types of patients will make matters worse. Life-threatening doses of acute total body radiation are so infrequently encountered that management policies must be derived in part from different but analogous clinical situations and from studies in experimental animals.
Conventional injuries should be treated first and initial triage should be based on these injuries, since no immediate life-threatening hazard exists for radiation casualties who can ultimately survive. The patient with multiple injuries should be resuscitated and stabilized. During this process, standard preoperative preparation for surgery will accomplish much radioactive decontamination. More definitive evaluation of the radiation injury can be initiated postoperatively.
Three groups of conventional injury patients will have to be considered:
Further classification of patients will not be required prior to evacuation. The presence or absence of radiation injury, in general, will be ignored in this preliminary sorting, since there are no reliable guidelines to aid in the early diagnosis of extent of radiation injury. Eventually, however, all casualties unable to continue as effective soldiers will have to be evacuated.
As noted, there is a requirement for appropriate holding facilities to which patients who cannot be treated immediately or who require only minimal treatment can be evacuated. These facilities should be set up with limited equipment and staffed with small numbers of medical personnel, and should be part of the expansion plans of all field hospitals regardless of size or location. Holding facilities should be as close to hospitals as possible so as to optimize the availability of appropriate additional care and to allow the transfer of patients as the overall situation and balance between medical resources and patient load change. A great variety of patients, including those not fit for field duty but not requiring full-care-type hospitalization, as well as the very severely injured, should be kept there. These should include patients in the following categories:
Radiation injury introduces many complications into the patient's course. Hematologic injuries cause anemia, infection, bleeding, and delayed wound healing. Performance decrements due largely to neuromediator release can also impact the patient. At higher doses of radiation, dehydration due to severe fluid and electrolyte losses through the intestinal wall will be encountered.
After conventional injuries have been managed, the physician is faced with the problem of triaging the patients according to the severity of their radiation injuries so that appropriate treatment can begin. This problem is difficult since the response of any given individual may vary greatly, and a nonhomogenous exposure of radiation (especially if bone marrow and gut are spared) may result in a markedly decreased effect. U.S. forces do not carry individual personal dosimeters that measure neutron and photon exposures. Finally, dose rate effects can be very profound, especialIy in a fallout environment. In this situation, tactical dosimeters (two per platoon) may be useful to a commander deciding whether to commit exposed troops to battle, but they are less useful to the health care provider. Other problems will also exist. Casualties will be numerous and resources certainly will be strained. Complicating this will be the occurrence of blast and thermal injuries (in addition to radiation injuries). Improved dosimetry is needed for triage since the goal of military medical personnel should be the appropriate allocation of precious resources to salvage the maximum number of casualties. Improved dosimetry is currentIy unavailable, but its desirability is currently undergoing evaluation by the U.S. Army Academy of Health Sciences.
Based on recent recommendations, the following guidelines apply to medical personnel operating in austere field conditions. The lymphocyte level can be used as a biological dosimeter to confirm the presence of pure radiation injury, but not in combined injuries. If the physician has the resources of a clinical laboratory additional information can be obtained to support the original working diagnosis suggested by the presence of prodromal symptoms. An initial blood sample for concentrations of circulating lymphocytes should be obtained as soon as possible from any patient classified as "radiation injury possible" or "radiation injury probable" After the initial assessment, or at least no later than 24 hours after the event in question, additional comparative blood samples should be taken. The samples may be interpreted as follows:
A useful rule of thumb is: If lymphocytes have decreased by 50% or are less than 1000/mm3, the individual has received a significant radiation exposure. In the event of combined injuries, the diagnostic use of lymphocytes may be unreliable. It should be borne in mind that those with severe burns or multisystem trauma often develop lymphopenia.
It is difficult to establish an early definitive diagnosis. Therefore, it is best to utilize a simple, tentative classification system based on three possible categories of patients as discussed below.
Categorization of these patients into one of these three irradiation categories will be facilitated by an appreciation for the characteristic symptoms induced by radiation. These are:
Casualties receiving a potentially fatal dose of radiation will most likely experience a pattern of prodromal symptoms that is associated with the radiation exposure itself. Unfortunately, these symptoms are nonspecific and may be seen with other forms of illness or injury, thereby seriously complicating the radiation exposure diagnosis. Therefore, the triage officer must determine if the symptoms occurred within the first day postexposure, evaluate the possibility that they are indeed related to radiation exposure, and then assign the patient to one of the three categories: "Radiation Injury Unlikely," "Radiation Injury Probable," or "Radiation Injury Severe" In the last two categories, the observation of changes in circulating lymphocyte counts may either support or rule out the original working diagnosis. All individuals with multiple injuries should be treated initially as if no significant radiation injury is present. Triage and care of any life. threatening injuries should be rendered without regard to the probability of radiation injury. The medical officer should make a preliminary diagnosis of radiation injury only in those patients for whom radiation is the sole source of the problem. This is based on the appearance of nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, erythema, hyperthermia, hypotension, and neurologic dysfunction.
Decontamination of the Patient. Radiation injury per se does not imply that the patient is a health hazard to the medical staff. Studies indicate that the levels of intrinsic radiation present within the patient from activation (after exposure to neutron and high-energy photon sources) are not life-threatening to the medical staff.
Patients entering a medical treatment facility should be routinely decontaminated if monitoring for radiation is not available. Removal of the patient's clothing will usually reduce most of the contamination. Washing exposed body surfaces will further reduce this problem. Both of these procedures can be performed in the field or on the way to the treatment facility. Once the patient has entered the treatment facility, care should be based on the obvious injuries. Care for life-threatening injuries should not be delayed until the decontamination procedures are completed.
When radiation safety personnel are available, decontamination procedures will be established to assist in rendering care and to minimize the hazard from radioactive contaminants. A more extensive decontamination procedure is to scrub the areas of persistent contamination with a mild detergent or a diluted strong detergent. Caution should be taken to not disrupt the integrity of the skin while scrubbing, because disruption can lead to incorporation of the radioisotopes into deeper layers of the skin. Contaminated wounds should be treated first, since they will rapidly incorporate the contaminant. Washing, gentle scrubbing, or even debridement may be necessary to reduce the level of contaminants.
Wearing surgical attire will reduce the possible contamination of health personnel. If additional precautions are warranted, rotation of the attending personnel will further reduce the possibility of significant contamination or exposure. The prevention of incorporation is of paramount importance. The inhalation or ingestion of radioactive particles is a much more difficult problem, and resources to deal with it will not be available in a field situation.
All contents copyright © 1997-2000 The University of Iowa. All rights reserved.
URL: http://www.vnh.org/